88.2 F
The Villages
Friday, April 19, 2024

PWAC backs down on controversial fence at unsanctioned dog park in The Villages

The Project Wide Advisory Committee backed down on a controversial plan for a fence at an unsanctioned dog park after angry Villagers showed up in droves.

It was the #10 story in 2018 in Villages-News.com.

PWAC members had approved a nearly $5,000 fence at a three-acre parcel along the multi-modal path that parallels Morse Boulevard south of County Road 466A. A Premier homeowner had complained about the noise and smell from dogs on the public green space in back of his residence.

A Villager walks his dog on a three-acre parcel located behind the home of Villager Marvin Rosser.

The board ultimately voted to rescind the original action for the fence. The vote was 5-1, with the lone vote in opposition coming from PWAC member Don Wiley, chairman of Community Development District 10, who originally raised the issue on behalf of resident Marvin Rosser.

Wiley was re-elected to the CDD 10 board in November, but his victory was a squeaker. It was upheld after a recount.

Golf course deserves a failing grade

A Village of Hadley resident recently played an executive golf course that had earned a B- grade in a recent report grade. He says the golf course now deserves a failing grade.

It’s great that Villages-News.com features holes-in-one

A reader from Arkansas is envious that Villages-News.com publishes stories celebrating Villagers’ holes-in-one. He wishes he and his friends could get that kind of recognition where they live.

Roosevelt Executive Golf Course should be downgraded to F grade

A Village of Bradford resident, in a Letter to the Editor, contends the Roosevelt Executive Golf Course has a D grade, but should be an F.

The press is biased against Trump

In a Letter to the Editor, a Village of Osceola Hills makes the case that the press is biased against former President Trump.

Former Morse South Gate attendant offers a little perspective

A former Morse South Gate attendant, in a Letter to the Editor, offers a little perspective after another letter writer was critical of attendants working that gate.