To the Editor:
I’m finding it difficult to believe that adults would argue that they “get to face my accuser” when a complaint is filed on a suspected failure to comply with the property covenants. Firstly, the complaint is actually a question, “is this a violation of the covenants?” The Architectural Review Committee makes the determination if a violation has occurred. Secondly, the homeowner should already KNOW the covenants to which he already agreed. If there is a question, the Homeowner should have simply called Architectural Review and asked. Arguing that “I should get to face my accuser” is confirmation that the Homeowner did not really intend to comply to begin with.
Dana Lambillotte
Village of St. Charles